Hey fam! The Trump-Putin Alaska summit had everyone buzzing across Mumbai coffee shops, Jakarta co-working spaces, and beyond. We tapped three top experts from the U.S., the EU and Russia to unpack what really went down:
Mixed Signals on Arms Control 🤝🛑
Robert English, USC associate prof, thinks the face-to-face was a step toward saving key nuclear arms talks like New START. But he warns that lofty statements don’t always translate into concrete action. "Talk is cheap—but keeping channels open matters," he says.
Europe’s Security Check ⚔️💡
Ulrich Brückner, from Stanford’s EU studies bureau in Berlin, highlights how cyber norms and energy politics could be reshaped. He sees a chance for Europe to benefit if both sides dial down aggressive posturing—especially in digital security and cross-border energy projects.
Trust Issues Remain 🌍🤔
Andrey Kortunov, a Russian international affairs expert, gives props to the summit for spotlighting strategic stability. Yet he cautions that decades of suspicion won’t vanish overnight. Real partnership demands follow-up meetings and verification on the ground.
Whether you’re hustling at a Mumbai startup or coding from Jakarta, these high-stakes chats have ripple effects on global tech flows, trade deals, and even your daily news feed. Stay tuned—only time will tell if summit talk turns into real-world wins! 😊
Reference(s):
Experts from U.S., EU, Russia analyze Putin-Trump summit outcomes
cgtn.com
