At the end of September, U.S. President Donald Trump rolled out a bold 20-point proposal aiming to kickstart peace in Gaza. While it sounds promising on paper, the plan’s real impact is sparking debates across the region 🌍.
Despite its 20 steps, critics say this proposal feels more like a political chess move than a clear roadmap. Key concerns include:
- No binding timeline for Israel’s full withdrawal—a main ask from Hamas.
- Vague details on which countries would join the “International Stabilization Force.”
- No explicit mention of the widely recognized “two-state solution.”
To add fuel to the fire, Hamas was left out of the latest round of talks and has already pushed back on core elements. Without firm deadlines or ironclad commitments, some fear this deal could become an endless compromise rather than a genuine breakthrough ⚠️.
Whether the 20-point plan leads to lasting calm or just another round of tense negotiations remains to be seen. For now, the clock is ticking on Hamas’s decision—with the Middle East watching closely 👀.
Reference(s):
U.S. 20-point Gaza plan: Path to peace or a compromise without end?
cgtn.com
