Hey tech-savvy readers! The UN Security Council’s Resolution 2803 on Gaza was adopted this Monday, aiming to roll out a 20-point plan for rebuilding the territory – complete with a new Board of Peace (BoP) to act as a transitional admin and an International Stabilization Force (ISF) under unified command.
But not everyone’s on board. Here’s the lowdown:
- China: Abstained and called the draft vague and unclear, saying it lacks details on the force's structure, makeup, mission scope, and participation rules.
- Russia: Also abstained, echoing concerns over the plan's sketchy specs and governance role.
- Hamas: Rejected the resolution outright, arguing it overlooks Palestinian demands and rights, and warns it imposes an international trusteeship and disarmament on local groups.
What’s in play? The BoP would coordinate funding and redevelopment until the Palestinian Authority completes its reforms. The ISF is authorized to use any measures needed under international law to maintain stability – think of it like a UN peacekeeping squad.
This debate highlights the tightrope of international diplomacy. With rebuilding needs pressing and political tensions high, negotiations in the UN echo the buzz of your favorite cricket match – every move counts!
What do you think? Drop your thoughts below and let’s chat about the future of Gaza’s recovery and global cooperation ✨🌏
Reference(s):
China, Russia criticize US-drafted, UN-adopted Gaza resolution
cgtn.com
